Review: Gathering observational data
Page Last modified: 9 October 1998
- Four general problems with observations:
- stations and observations are spaced at irregular intervals
- there are biases in sampling:
- station observations:
- land areas better sampled than ocean areas
- surface is better sampled than upper atmosphere
- developed nations have denser coverage than undeveloped regions
- midlatitudes sampled better than polar regions
- satellites
- soundings in clear sky
- cloud tracked winds can't see clouds underneath higher clouds, etc.
- etc. for other observing platforms...
- lack of representativeness (how well does the observation
represent the larger scale pattern?)
- station sited in a mountain valley or next to a lake
- station on windward or lee side of a mountainous, but isolated, small
island
- sonde was released into a thunderstorm (!)
- etc.
- instrument and transmission errors
- inherent inaccuracy of the device
- inaccuracy of the method of deducing the data
- what level should a cloud tracked wind be assigned to?
- inversion of IR signature to obtain a satellite T sounding
has limitations...
- incorrect location, e.g. of a ship or aircraft
- reduction to sea level problems
- mistyped data transmission
   
- Many sources of data:
- station based data considered the most reliable
- satellite information and other items listed in the table of
observing systems are mainly used to fill in the gaps of the
station based network.
Back to
ATM 111 homepage